URL for this article:
http://www.electionline.org/Newsletters/tabid/87/ctl/
Detail/mid/643/xmid/206/xmfid/3/Default.aspx
Please note that your story is inaccurate as it relates to voting for persons with disabilities in New York State.
Yes, the plan that the DOJ agreed to is an abomination. In New York City, 23 ballot markers will be allocated to local Board of Election offices -- 5 each to Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx and three to Staten Island.
As I stated, these are ballot markers, which, although based upon touchscreen technology, are not DRE machines. Optical scan machines are not accessible to persons with disabilities. HAVA requires that persons with disabilities have the right to cast an independent and secret ballot. To comply with HAVA, optical scan machines must utilize ballot markers to comply with accessibility requirements.
New York's "Plan B"
for HAVA implementation involves the use of a limited number of these ballot markers for use in Tuesday's primary. We fear it may create chaos because persons with disabilities will have to travel some distance by public transportation to go to their local boards to cast an accessible ballot, only to be confronted with long lines and few machines. Some individuals may require twenty minutes or more to cast a ballot. However, we in the disability community have resisted calls for buoycotting these machines because we believe that voters with disabilities should have the right to choose to cast an inaccessible ballot at their polling place or an accessible one at the local Board of Elections office.
While Larry Rockefeller might be right in asserting that chaos may result from the limited use of these ballot markers on Primary Day, I am confused about his rationale for challenging this, given the fact that the alternative is that persons with disabilities will once again not be able to cast an independent and secret ballot.
Mr. Rockefeller and the petitioners confuse these ballot markers with DRE machines, which they are not. Indeed, advocates for optical scan machines have recognized that ballot markers would be required to supplement these machines in order to comply with HAVA. Would he continue to deny the right of access for persons with disabilities to the same voting rights as all others have?
-Marvin Wasserman
electionline Weekly - September 7, 2006
electionline.org
In Focus This Week
Disabled voters in New York face substantial barriers to in-person voting
Justice Department settlement mandates only one accessible machine per county
By M. Mindy Moretti
electionline.org
Despite a federal law that guarantees them a secret and independent ballot and a settlement between the state and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) over the implementation of that law, voters with disabilities in New York will face substantial barriers to casting in-person ballots when they go to the polls on Tuesday and again in November.
Those who choose to cast in-person ballots may have to travel great distances because, per the settlement with DOJ, the state need have only one accessible machine per county, and in New York City, one per borough.
New York lags behind the rest of the country in complying with the disability provisions of the Help America Vote Act of 2002, which require access to polling places as well as machines capable of allowing those with disabilities, including visual impairments to cast ballots "in a manner that provides the same opportunity for access and participation."
Many activists as well as advocates for the disabled dismiss the plan as a waste of time and money and not effective in alleviating accessibility woes.
"Anyone who hears this plan immediately thinks it's ridiculous,"
said Chris Hildebrant, director of advocacy for the Center of Disability Rights in Rochester. "It's not a plan at all."
The plan is the result of a lawsuit filed by DOJ in March, citing the state for failing to adopt voting systems accessible for voter with disabilities.
The lawsuit threatened to revoke federal funds used in New York state elections if the state did not comply with HAVA requirements by the September primaries. Additionally, DOJ required New York to submit a plan on how it intends to gain full compliance.
On June 2, the court signed off on the state's interim plan. According to Newsday, New York has thus far ordered 150 new voting machines targeted for disabled voters, costing as much as $5,000 apiece, in its implementation of "Plan B"
. These machines, which aid disabled voters in completing paper ballots, will not likely be used past the fall.
"The Department of Justice's rush to force the state to certify and buy computerized voting machines in time for the September primaries is a perfect storm for voting disaster,"
said voting activist Larry Rockefeller in a press release by a coalition of people opposed to the lawsuit and its consequences. "These machines have failed all over the country in other jurisdictions and, under this time pressure, will definitely fail New Yorkers."
New York's need for an interim plan and temporary voting machines stems from its inability to follow HAVA's proper timeline for replacing lever voting machines with newer ones.
"There was just no way at this late date that they could certify, we could pick the systems, and that we could have them up and going,"
Lynne Jones, the elections commissioner for Madison County, told the Oneida Daily Dispatch.
Though "Plan B"
attempts to bring the state closer to HAVA compliance, many nonetheless feel that the solution contains large flaws.
Many disabled voters will not only have to travel beyond their local polling places, they will also have to leave their voting precinct to access the one machine in the county that caters to their voting needs.
In Hamilton County, disabled voters may have to travel approximately 45 minutes to utilize an accessible voting machine, said the county's election office. However, transportation to and from the polling place will be provided.
"With this setup, they have really managed to please nobody and upset everybody,"
said Hildebrant.
While it may take 30 to 40 minutes to get to an accessible poll in Monroe County using private transportation, Hildebrant said that it could take well over an hour for people relying on public transportation.
Privacy violations are also among the growing list of complaints. Only disabled voters will utilize the new machines, thus determining how the cohort vote is simple.
While state officials acknowledge some of the "Plan B's"
flaws, they view it overall in a positive light.
"Is this a good solution?"
said Lee Daghlian, spokesman for the state Board of Elections. "Not really the best. But under the circumstances and the timelines with HAVA, it's probably the best (counties) can do at this point."
The "best"
solution for the Board of Elections still does not comfort Hildebrant over the negative effect the set-up will have on disabled voters.
"A horrible weakness about this plan is that it puts a pessimistic demeanor in people,"
said Hildebrant.
New York's primary election will be held September 12, while the general election will take place on November 7.